Preacher's Rhetorical Dilemma
Driving home: rhetoric must always be subject to the dictates of God in his word.
Martin uses the analogy of a preacher facing a two-and-a-half-hour sermon to explain why he sometimes has to split passages, prioritizing fidelity to the text over rhetorical unity, and 'spitting in rhetoric's face'.
The only way to be true to the grammar, to the Spirit-wrought emphases of the passage is to go from here to here. is to go from here to here, but it would take you two and a half hours. And you know it's not right, for a number of reasons, to preach for two and a half hours, and you have to split the thing up. Well, it means there are times when in splitting it up, there will be something that will suffer from a rhetorical standpoint, and at that point, as I tried to teach the men in the academy, rhetoric must always be subject to the dictates of God in his word.
14:48 - 15:14 Read in full sermon