Battalion vs. Army Commander
The point: If God's providence has withheld a discernible proving ground for a man to manifest gifts to govern, the office of eldership is shut to him until such an opportunity arises.
Paul's reasoning from lesser to greater (ruling a house to ruling the church) is compared to a man unable to command a battalion being unfit to command an army, emphasizing the need for proven leadership in a smaller sphere before a larger one.
That's the non-negotiable principle. Only those with a proven ability to exercise sanctified leadership of others are to bear rule in the church of God. Since in most cases the presence or the absence of this gift will be most accurately discovered in a man's domestic government of his family, Paul focuses upon that framework for proving one's ability to rule. If a man is to rule, and knows not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God? Arguing from the lesser to the greater. If he does not show competence in that lesser sphere, what grounds do we have to believe t...
9:27 - 10:41 Read in full sermon